Alp SuleimanGrowth Partner

Productivity · USA (San Francisco)

Tome → Lightfield

The presentation tool that reached more than twenty million users fastest stalled at around three million dollars in annual revenue with paid conversion under two percent; the founders shut it down, built a sales CRM with six people and reached a thousand paying customers in ten months.

Verdict: Perception level

Updated: 2026-10-06

01

Profile

What it does
Tome was an AI presentation tool; according to founder Peiris "the first real generative AI-based presentation platform" [1]. It was shut down in April 2025. Lightfield is the same founders' agent-first sales CRM: "a world model of your company, starting with your customers" [7].
Founded
2020. Tome was shut down in April 2025; Lightfield was announced in November 2025 [1].
Founders
Keith Peiris (CEO) and Henri Liriani, both formerly at Facebook and Instagram [1].
Pricing model
Tome was freemium; paid conversion under two percent [4]. Lightfield took its first ten customers not with a price but in exchange for office desks [2].
Funding
  • February 2023: $43M Series B at a $300M valuation (led by Lightspeed; Greylock, Coatue, Audacious); Tome total around $81M (secondary data) [8]
  • CB Insights counts $107.5M in total; sources disagree (secondary data) [9]
  • 9 September 2026: Lightfield $47M Series A led by a16z [6]

02

Growth timeline

  1. 2023

    1M users; "fastest productivity tool to reach 1 million users" (relayed)

    [5]
  2. 2023-02

    $43M Series B at a $300M valuation (secondary data)

    [8]
  3. 2024-04

    20% of staff laid off; 20M users, $3.5M ARR, under 2% paid conversion

    "viral AI slide creation was not enough to fund a standalone business"

    [4]
  4. 2025-04

    Tome shut down; team from around 70 to 6

    annual revenue had settled around $3M

    [5]
  5. 2025-11-13

    Lightfield launch; 100+ customers, half using it more than an hour a day

    [1]
  6. 2026-09-09

    $47M Series A; more than 5,000 companies signed up

    "over 5,000 companies have signed up"

    [6]

03

Growth loop

  1. 1Viral demo
  2. 2Free sign-up
  3. 3Deck creation, sharing
  4. 4Payment: under 2%
  5. 5Missing link: customer context
  6. Leak: usage that never turns into payment

Tome's loop produced distribution, not payment: a product that could start a draft could not finish it without context. Lightfield put the missing link, customer context, at the centre of the product.

The drawing shows the shape of the loop; each node is explained in the list below. The red arrow marks value leaking out of the loop.

04

Mechanism

Acquisition channels
Tome grew through a viral launch; VentureBeat called it "visually delightful and easy to use" [1]. When capacity ran out, users queued up [3]. Which social channel, which creators: not in the sources; not found. Lightfield did the opposite: it took ten startups with an offer on X and LinkedIn, "sit in our office, use our CRM"; feedback arrived roughly every two hours [2]. Then LinkedIn prospecting and emails to YC companies [3].
Loop
Tome: demo, sign-up, deck creation, sharing. The loop produced distribution but not payment; Sacra's summary: "viral AI slide creation was not enough to fund a standalone business" [4]. The positioning difference was decisive (opinion): Tome chose to let anyone tell a story and drew non-paying individuals and students; in the same category Gamma targeted the professional with a budget.
Activation
The first moment of value was strong; it is relayed as the fastest productivity tool to reach a million users [5]. But there was no second moment of value. Peiris: "the more people used it, the more I realized that to really help people communicate something—anything—we needed more context" [1]. Starting a draft was easy; finishing it without context was impossible.
Retention evidence
No figures. Indirectly: paid conversion under two percent, ARR plateaued between $3M and $3.5M [4]. No retention evidence; the plateau itself may count as evidence (opinion).
Role of pricing
Tome was freemium, $3.5M ARR from 20 million users [4]. Lightfield took its first ten customers at a negative price, office space in exchange [2]; by July 2026, 1,000 paying customers and 80 percent month-over-month growth are relayed [5].
Distribution moves
The vertical came from Tome's usage data: "We chose this lane, 'sales,' because so many people in these roles used Tome" [1]. About half of Tome's cash and its GPU reserve became capital for the second product [5].
Team
Tome went from around 70 people to 6 in March 2025 [5]. Peiris's self-criticism: "we had a lot of people playing house"; separate lanes for product, marketing and customer-success leaders made pivoting impossible [3]. To Forbes: the technology and culture thesis at Tome was immature [5].

05

Real reading

The five questions of the Growth Claim Check, applied to this company's public claims.

  1. 01

    What was measured, and by whom?

    yes

    Users (20–25M), paid conversion (under 2%) and ARR ($3–3.5M) are in secondary sources but agree with each other.

  2. 02

    Perception or outcome?

    no

    What Tome measured was perception: user count and "fastest to 1 million"; the revenue outcome was weak. At Lightfield, more than an hour of daily use is an outcome signal.

  3. 03

    Is there a stability or quality metric?

    no

    No stability at Tome; for Lightfield, "80% monthly growth" is a single point on a small base.

  4. 04

    Is there a counterfactual or cohort?

    no

    No counterfactual or cohort.

  5. 05

    Nominal or real?

    unclear

    Tome's user growth was nominal (free); Lightfield's 1,000 paying customers are real but early.

Verdict

Perception level

Tome is at the perception level: user count as a showcase, no revenue. Lightfield is early and incomplete; the verdict belongs to the Tome period, because that is where the lesson is.

Test your own claim with the same five questions: Growth Claim Check →

06

Shadow side

  • User count as a showcase, no revenue: 20% layoffs in April 2024, from around 70 people to 6 in March 2025 [4] [5].
  • Category risk: bundling by Microsoft, Google and Canva; Sacra's stated reason for the shutdown [4].
  • Total funding varies between $80M and $107.5M across sources; the primary record was not opened [8] [9].
  • The Tome brand passed to AngelList; the shutdown announcement itself could not be opened, relayed [10].

07

What it teaches a founder in Türkiye

This section is opinion; a reading, not a source.

  1. 01

    (opinion) User count is not growth. Twenty-five million users, conversion under two percent, three and a half million dollars in revenue. Test question: how many people pay, and how many of them are still there a month later?

  2. 02

    (opinion) The target audience determines pricing. "Everyone" does not pay; in the same category Gamma chose the professional with a budget and grew profitably.

  3. 03

    (opinion) Without a second moment of value, the first is wasted. Starting a draft is easy; without customer, call and deal context the product stays half done. That is the context moat.

  4. 04

    (opinion) A shutdown is also a growth decision. With half the cash and six people, the second product reached a thousand paying customers in ten months. A lesson for products in Turkey that "did not fail but are not growing".

  5. 05

    (opinion) Win the first ten customers with proximity, not price. Office desks in exchange for feedback several times a day; the fastest way to learn for a low-traffic product.

A question for you: remove this company's logo and drop the loop onto your own product. Which node stays empty?

08

Sources

Numbers are the references in the text. An 'opened' source was read by the researcher; 'secondary' ones are verified against their primary source before publication.

  1. [1]
    Tome's founders ditch viral presentation app with 20M users to build AI-native CRM Lightfield

    VentureBeat (Michael Nuñez) · 2025-11-20 · opened

    “the more people used it, the more I realized that to really help people communicate something—anything—we needed more context.”

  2. [2]
    'None of us like the product': Lightfield CEO on pivoting away from 25M users (a16z podcast summary)

    Scuttlebutt · 2026-09-16 · opened

    “You can sit in our office space if you use our CRM”

  3. [3]
    Lightfield / a16z podcast summary

    BigGo Finance (secondary data) · 2026-09-16 · opened

    “we had a lot of people playing house”

  4. [4]
    Tome pivots away from AI presentations

    Sacra · 2024 · opened

    “viral AI slide creation was not enough to fund a standalone business”

  5. [5]
    Startup de IA pasa de demostraciones llamativas a tecnología que genera ingresos

    Forbes (Spanish edition; Rashi Shrivastava) · 2026-07-22 · opened

    “Siendo franco sobre Tome, nuestra tesis sobre tecnología y nuestra tesis cultural fue muy inmadura.”

  6. [6]
    Our $47M Series A

    Lightfield (official blog; Keith Peiris) · 2026-09-09 · opened

    “over 5,000 companies have signed up”

  7. [7]
    Why we built Lightfield

    Lightfield (official blog; Peiris and Liriani) · 2025-11-13 · opened

    “automation is a consequence of understanding—not the starting point”

  8. [8]
    Tome's founders raise $47M for Lightfield's agent-first CRM

    Runtimewire (secondary data) · 2026-09-09 · opened

    “Tome had raised about $81 million before the pivot, including a $43 million Series B led by Lightspeed Venture Partners in February 2023 at a reported $300 million valuation.”

  9. [9]
    Tome company profile

    CB Insights (secondary data) · accessed 2026-10-05 · opened

    “ceased operations in April 2025”

  10. [10]
    What Happened to Tome AI?

    Deckary (unsourced; date skeleton only) · accessed 2026-10-05 · opened

    “made every effort to improve Tome Slides and turn it into a viable business but ultimately failed to find a sustainable path”

09

Open questions

  • Tome's official shutdown notice was not opened; the shutdown quote is relayed.
  • Is total funding $80M or $107.5M.
  • Lightfield's Series A valuation was not disclosed.
  • Tome's acquisition channels (which social network, which creators) are not in the sources.