Vertical B2B · USA (founded in London)
11x
The AI sales-rep company reached a ten-million-dollar ARR claim on the back of two top-tier investor signatures; an investigation showed that ARR rested on contracts with exit clauses, unauthorized logos and high early churn.
Verdict: Perception level
Updated: 2026-10-06
01
Profile
- What it does
- "Digital workers" for sales: Alice for outbound (email, LinkedIn), Julian for inbound and outbound phone. Positioning: "Instead of adding yet another tool to your crowded tech stack, we're offering a different approach—we sell work." [6]
- Founded
- 2022, London; moved to San Francisco in 2024 [6]
- Founders
- Hasan Sukkar (CEO until May 2025); then CTO Prabhav Jain became CEO [3]
02
Growth timeline
2024-09-16
$24M Series A (Benchmark)
Alice: "up to 3x higher response rates compared to human SDRs"
[6]2024-09-30
About $50M Series B (a16z); ARR approaching $10M claimed
"approaching $10 million in annual recurring revenue"
[5]2025-03-24
TechCrunch investigation: unauthorized logos, 70-80% early churn alleged
ZoomInfo: "We did not give them permission to use our logo in any manner, and we are not a customer."
[1]2025-03-26
OnlyCFO: ARR has no definition
"ARR (annual recurring revenue) is not a GAAP metric."
[4]2025-05-06
Founder steps down as CEO
"Different growth phases demand different leadership strengths"
[3]2026-05-14
Unsourced Ramp claim: 40% of the category
"40% of enterprises buying in this category chose 11x"
[10]
03
Growth loop
- 1Annual contract, 90-day exit clause
- 2Full-year ARR count
- 3New customers via logos and investor names
- 4Churn at day 90
- Leak: gap between ARR and cash collected
The claimed loop was agent, meeting, pipeline and renewal. The loop that actually ran was contract, ARR count and exit clause; the red arrow shows the gap between reported and collected revenue.
The drawing shows the shape of the loop; each node is explained in the list below. The red arrow marks value leaking out of the loop.
04
Mechanism
- Acquisition channels
- Four channels: back-to-back Benchmark and a16z signatures and the press they generated [5]; the "we sell work, not software" positioning and the comparison with human SDR cost [6]; logo marketing, which became the subject of the investigation [1]; and after 2025 the IBM watsonx partnership [7]. The homepage still promises "$1M+ pipeline generated in first 3 months" [8].
- Loop
- The claimed loop: the AI SDR books meetings, meetings become pipeline, customers expand. Per TechCrunch, the loop that ran: annual contracts with a 90-day exit clause, full-year ARR counting, early churn and a gap between ARR and collections [1]. The company said the figure it reported was contracted ARR (CARR) and that investors knew [1].
- Activation
- Demo-gated entry; a pipeline promise within the first three months [8]. Customer complaints cite hallucinations and the email product not working as expected [1].
- Retention evidence
- Two conflicting claims: the company said retention had risen to 79%, a former employee said 70-80% of customers coming through the door were lost [1]. The company admitted early cohorts carried the highest churn [1]. (opinion) The two claims may measure different periods and definitions; neither is verified.
- Role of pricing
- Annual contracts with exit clauses presented a trial period as ARR; OnlyCFO proposed the term "ERR" (Experimental Runrate Revenue) for exactly this [4]. (opinion) The core of this case is not the price model but the revenue definition.
- Distribution moves
- The May 2025 relaunch of Alice and Julian, and IBM watsonx Orchestrate and Agent Connect integrations [7]. In 2026 a "40% of the category" claim attributed to Ramp data without a report link [10].
- Team
- Headcount is not official. TechCrunch reported weeks above 60 hours, open criticism on Slack and allegations of late pay [1].
05
Real reading
The five questions of the Growth Claim Check, applied to this company's public claims.
- 01
What was measured, and by whom?
yes
"ARR" was measured, but the definition is contracted ARR with exit clauses; company statement.
- 02
Perception or outcome?
no
"3x response rates" and pipeline claims were presented as outcomes with no disclosed comparison method.
- 03
Is there a stability or quality metric?
unclear
A retention claim exists (79%) but definition and period are unclear; no margin.
- 04
Is there a counterfactual or cohort?
yes
ZoomInfo's own trial is a counterfactual: the product performed significantly worse than its SDR employees; the result went against the company.
- 05
Nominal or real?
no
Nominal: a former employee's example: a $14M ARR claim against only about $3M in contracts that passed the three-month trial [1].
Verdict
Perception level
A gap between reported and realized revenue of $14M against about $3M in a former employee's example; the counterfactual was run by a customer and came out negative. A textbook case for the Growth Claim Check.
Test your own claim with the same five questions: Growth Claim Check →
06
Shadow side
- Unauthorized logo use: ZoomInfo said "We did not give them permission to use our logo in any manner, and we are not a customer."; Airtable said its trial was never used in production [1].
- ARR definition: contracted ARR with a 90-day exit clause; a former employee claimed "We were losing 70-80% of customers that came through the door" [1]. OnlyCFO: "There is no regulatory body governing how we define ARR." [4]
- The founder stepped down as CEO in May 2025 [3].
- The 2026 Ramp claim was made without a report link or date [10]. (opinion) The same pattern of behavior.
- Secondary analyses relay G2 and Reddit complaints about "generic outreach" and "inflexible contracts" (secondary data) [9].
07
What it teaches a founder in Türkiye
This section is opinion; a reading, not a source.
- 01
(opinion) Write down your ARR definition. Contracts with exit clauses, trials and pilots are separate lines; telling investors "they knew" does not satisfy customers or the press.
- 02
(opinion) No logo without permission. In Turkey too, the "our references" page is the most inflated one; get written consent for every logo.
- 03
(opinion) Do not hide early churn. The 70-80% loss claim leaked from employees; had the founder said it first, the story would be different.
- 04
(opinion) "We sell work" requires outcome measurement. If you claim to replace SDRs, publish the customer's comparison with its own SDRs yourself. Test question: if your largest customer ran the same test, would you share the result?
- 05
(opinion) An unsourced third-party badge does not repair trust. Repair comes from transparency.
A question for you: remove this company's logo and drop the loop onto your own product. Which node stays empty?
08
Sources
Numbers are the references in the text. An 'opened' source was read by the researcher; 'secondary' ones are verified against their primary source before publication.
- [1]a16z- and Benchmark-backed 11x has been claiming customers it doesn't have
TechCrunch (Marina Temkin) · 2025-03-24 · opened
“We were losing 70-80% of customers that came through the door”
- [2]Controversies surround AI startup 11x over customer claims and product performance
Startup Ecosystem Canada · 2025-03 · secondary
Note: secondary summary
- [3]Founder of a16z-backed 11x steps down as CEO
Tech.eu · 2025-05-06 · opened
“Different growth phases demand different leadership strengths. In our early stage, we needed 0-1 energy, fast-paced execution”
- [4]AI Company Accused of Fraud?
OnlyCFO · 2025-03-26 · opened
“ARR (annual recurring revenue) is not a GAAP metric. There is no regulatory body governing how we define ARR.”
- [5]11x.ai, a developer of AI sales reps, has raised $50M Series B led by a16z, sources say
TechCrunch · 2024-09-30 · opened
“approaching $10 million in annual recurring revenue”
- [6]Announcing our Series A
11x blog · 2024-09-16 · opened
“$24 million Series A funding round led by Benchmark”
- [7]Blog index (dates)
11x · accessed 2026-10-05 · opened
Note: 2023-08-11 pre-seed; 2025-05-02 Alice; 2025-05-07 Julian; IBM 2025-05-07 and 2025-10-07
- [8]
- [9]11x.ai Competitive Analysis (Q2 2026)
Toarn (secondary analysis) · 2026 · opened
Note: price estimate and a compilation of user complaints
- [10]Ramp Ranks 11x #1 in Enterprise Adoption for AI-First GTM
11x blog · 2026-05-14 · opened
“40% of enterprises buying in this category chose 11x”
09
Open questions
- The Ramp "AI-first GTM" report itself; the 40% claim needs verification.
- ARR after 2025: no source at all.
- Headcount and layoffs: no source.
- The detail of the "double billing" allegation is in the TechCrunch text; the verbatim sentence should be captured.
- The Benchmark Series A press release (unreachable); the 11x blog suffices.